""In one of the most significant constitutional rulings handed down in many years, the Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, has ruled that individual Americans have a right to protect themselves with a firearm under the 2nd Amendment."

www.americanthinker.com/blog/2...ri.html

San Fransisco, you're reckoning is come. Taking rights for PC reasons bites.

Posting this in the other gun tribes too.

Sas
posted by:
Sasquatch
offline Sasquatch
San Diego
220 friends
join to post
  • tony
    tony
    offline 150

    DC won't give up so easily

    Tue, July 1, 2008 - 8:28 AM
    Its not over yet;
    1. There are no (public) gun dealers in DC
    2. DC is claiming that only single shots and revolvers will be allowed.
    join to post
    • Sasq...
      Sasquatch
      offline 220

      Re: DC won't give up so easily

      Fri, July 4, 2008 - 12:41 AM
      Additionally, it don't relate that there are "no (public) gun dealers in DC" as the ruling addressed the right to keep and bear arms being an individula as opposed to collective right making it illegal for DC to ban personal possession. It doesn't matter where procured. Possession by individuals is now LEGAL. If they can't ban possession they can't prevent sales as it is a de-facto legal transaction.

      Limiting it to single shots and no place to buy ammo will not pass judicial muster now.

      You might want to study this a bit more.

      Sas
      join to post

Recent topics in "Gun Rights"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Don't worry the Government is here to help you dylan 1 August 11, 2008
California AB 2062, anyone? K 2 July 4, 2008
NRA lawyers 1 May 20, 2008
save the cow palace gun show, call mark leno missadventure 0 May 5, 2008
Sonoma County Paul 5 April 30, 2008