I'm with Genghis, in this case you very exactly can have it two ways. Building a web of priviledges doesn't mean we all sign something saying "and by accepting this piece of paper I concur that the second amendment on that other piece of paper no longer exists. I agree, that in a good world none of this would be necessary but what a web of reciprocity -will- do is demonstrate to people who believe that guns can cause normal people to become violent that they are wrong. And those are the folks we need.
You and I understand that we already have this right (ethically, if not always legally) and this is the lever we can apply to the minds that -don't- understand that and (more importantly) -don't- vote our way, to change their POV. We get this increment and in a few years we say say "hey, lookee here this patch of road is not covered in blood, how 'bout the ones in -your- neighborhood?". Then we have a small step to stand on when we say "Guess they were wrong about the cpl reciprocity, how 'bout we get more states to adopt -alaska- carry".
Incrementalism is how we've gotten to where we are. It's a political tool that we should use to get to where we want to be. IMHO